DNS & Email Security Report for hackerone.com

An automated analysis of hackerone.com's DNS configuration, email authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), DNSSEC chain, IPv6 readiness, and transport security. Last analyzed June 10, 2026.

A92/100
Very Good

Strong security posture

Overall security score: 92/100 · Grade A (Very Good)

This report is a cached snapshot

DNS changes frequently. Run a fresh, interactive scan of hackerone.com for live records, propagation, and deep checks.

Run a fresh live scan

Detailed check results

DNS

100%pass
  • A record presentcritical

    2 A record(s) found

  • AAAA record presentrecommended

    2 AAAA record(s) found

  • MX records presentrecommended

    5 MX record(s) found

  • NS records presentcritical

    2 NS record(s) found

  • SOA record presentcritical

    SOA record found

  • Multiple nameserversrecommended

    2 nameservers configured ✓

  • SOA serial formatinfo

    Serial 2404942641 (valid, managed DNS format)

  • SOA timers validinfo

    Refresh: 10000s ✓, Retry: 2400s ✓, Expire: 604800s ✓

  • No lame nameserversinfo

    2 NS all responding ✓

  • Glue records presentinfo

    4 glue record(s)

  • WWW record configuredinfo

    A record matches apex

  • MX servers have PTR recordsinfo

    8 MX IPs all have PTR records ✓

  • MX servers have FCrDNSinfo

    8 MX IPs have forward-confirmed reverse DNS ✓

DNSSEC

100%pass
  • DNSSEC signedrecommended

    DNSSEC is enabled ✓

  • DNSSEC validation OKcritical

    DNSSEC validates correctly ✓

  • NSEC3 RFC 9276 compliantrecommended

    Not applicable (domain uses NSEC or is not DNSSEC-signed)

  • RRSIG signatures validrecommended

    RRSIG signature expires in 1 days — renewal needed

  • Modern DNSSEC algorithmoptional

    ECDSA P-256 (algorithm 13) — modern ✓

  • DS digest algorithm modernrecommended

    DS digest: SHA-256 — modern ✓

  • DNSKEY algorithm secureoptional

    DNSKEY: ECDSA P-256 — modern ✓

  • RRSIG TTL saferecommended

    Record TTLs do not exceed RRSIG validity periods ✓

  • Chain of trust completecritical

    Complete chain: DNSKEY + DS + RRSIG ✓

IPv6

100%pass
  • Website reachable via IPv6recommended

    2 AAAA record(s) ✓

  • Mail servers reachable via IPv6recommended

    5/5 MX server(s) with IPv6 ✓

  • Nameservers reachable via IPv6recommended

    2/2 NS server(s) with IPv6 ✓

Email security

90%pass
  • SPF record presentcritical

    v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:amazonses.com include:mail.zendesk.com include:spf.mail.intercom.io include:mktomail.com include:registrarmail.net -all

  • SPF syntax validcritical

    SPF syntax is correct ✓

  • SPF policy strict (-all)recommended

    SPF uses -all (hard fail) ✓

  • DKIM foundrecommended

    DKIM selector: s1 ✓

  • DMARC record presentrecommended

    v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:[email protected],mailto:[email protected]; ruf=mailto:[email protected];

  • DMARC policy quarantine or betterrecommended

    DMARC policy: reject ✓

  • DMARC policy rejectoptional

    DMARC policy: reject ✓

  • BIMI record presentoptional

    BIMI logo: https://www.hackerone.com/assets/images/logo_short.svg

  • BIMI configuration validoptional

    BIMI correctly configured ✓

  • MTA-STS record presentoptional

    MTA-STS configured ✓

  • MTA-STS policy enforcedoptional

    MTA-STS mode: enforce ✓

  • MX records validcritical

    5 MX record(s) ✓

  • MX domains use DNSSECrecommended

    0/2 MX domain(s) have DNSSEC. Ask your mail provider to enable DNSSEC

  • MX DNSSEC validation OKrecommended

    DNSSEC not enabled for MX domains

  • Mail servers not blacklistedcritical

    1 MX server(s) checked against 13 blacklists - clean ✓

  • No critical blacklist listingscritical

    No blacklist listings ✓

Web security

77%warning
  • CAA records presentrecommended

    5 CAA record(s) ✓

  • CAA policy strictoptional

    CAA limits certificate authorities ✓

  • TLSA records (DANE)optional

    No TLSA/DANE records. Add TLSA at _25._tcp.mail for DANE email encryption

  • DANE configuration validoptional

    No DANE configured

  • No sensitive info in TXTcritical

    No sensitive data leaked ✓

  • Verification records reviewedinfo

    13 verification records found (Slack, Atlassian, Facebook/Meta, Stripe, Zoom...). Review these - they reveal your tech stack to attackers. Remove unused service verifications

  • HTTPS availablecritical

    HTTPS working (status 200) ✓

  • Valid certificatecritical

    Certificate chain is valid and trusted ✓

  • HTTP redirects to HTTPScritical

    HTTP automatically redirects to HTTPS ✓

  • HSTS enabledrecommended

    HSTS enabled (max-age=31536000, includeSubDomains, preload) ✓

  • HSTS max-age >= 1 yearoptional

    max-age=31536000 (≥1 year) ✓

  • X-Frame-Options headerrecommended

    X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN ✓

  • X-Content-Type-Options headerrecommended

    X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff ✓

  • Content-Security-Policy headerrecommended

    Content-Security-Policy configured ✓

  • Referrer-Policy headerrecommended

    No Referrer-Policy header. Add Referrer-Policy: strict-origin-when-cross-origin

  • security.txt presentoptional

    Contact: https://hackerone.com/security/reports/new

  • security.txt validoptional

    security.txt has required Contact and Expires fields ✓

  • HTTP/3 (QUIC) supportedoptional

    HTTP/3 (QUIC v1) on port 443 Detection methods: QUIC probe: QUIC v1 (RFC 9000) (7ms)

  • QUIC UDP reachableoptional

    QUIC reachable on UDP/443 (7ms) — QUIC v1 (RFC 9000) ✓

  • HTTPS DNS record (SVCB)optional

    No HTTPS DNS record (type 65). Add HTTPS record for faster HTTP/3 discovery: hackerone.com IN HTTPS 1 . alpn="h3,h2"

Issues found (1)

Excessive verification TXT records

Your domain has many third-party verification records. These reveal your tech stack to potential attackers (reconnaissance). Review and remove unused verifications

Learn more

Recommendations (1)

Review verification TXT records

Your domain has many third-party verification records that reveal your tech stack (Google, Microsoft, Atlassian, etc.). Review each one: 1) Remove records for services no longer used 2) Consider if each service really needs domain verification 3) Use a subdomain for less critical services. This is an information disclosure issue - attackers can map your SaaS footprint.

Impact: Reduces reconnaissance surface and limits attacker knowledge of your infrastructure

About this report

IntoDNS.AI evaluates hackerone.com against DNS hygiene, email authentication, and transport-security best practices, scoring each check and rolling them up into an overall grade. Results reflect public DNS as observed on June 10, 2026 and may differ from a live scan if the domain has since changed its configuration.

Want to check your own domain? Scan any domain on the homepage.

Last analyzed: June 10, 2026 · Google Public DNS