DNS & Email Security Report for hackerone.com
An automated analysis of hackerone.com's DNS configuration, email authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), DNSSEC chain, IPv6 readiness, and transport security. Last analyzed June 10, 2026.
Strong security posture
Overall security score: 92/100 · Grade A (Very Good)
This report is a cached snapshot
DNS changes frequently. Run a fresh, interactive scan of hackerone.com for live records, propagation, and deep checks.
Detailed check results
DNS
- A record presentcritical
2 A record(s) found
- AAAA record presentrecommended
2 AAAA record(s) found
- MX records presentrecommended
5 MX record(s) found
- NS records presentcritical
2 NS record(s) found
- SOA record presentcritical
SOA record found
- Multiple nameserversrecommended
2 nameservers configured ✓
- SOA serial formatinfo
Serial 2404942641 (valid, managed DNS format)
- SOA timers validinfo
Refresh: 10000s ✓, Retry: 2400s ✓, Expire: 604800s ✓
- No lame nameserversinfo
2 NS all responding ✓
- Glue records presentinfo
4 glue record(s)
- WWW record configuredinfo
A record matches apex
- MX servers have PTR recordsinfo
8 MX IPs all have PTR records ✓
- MX servers have FCrDNSinfo
8 MX IPs have forward-confirmed reverse DNS ✓
DNSSEC
- DNSSEC signedrecommended
DNSSEC is enabled ✓
- DNSSEC validation OKcritical
DNSSEC validates correctly ✓
- NSEC3 RFC 9276 compliantrecommended
Not applicable (domain uses NSEC or is not DNSSEC-signed)
- RRSIG signatures validrecommended
RRSIG signature expires in 1 days — renewal needed
- Modern DNSSEC algorithmoptional
ECDSA P-256 (algorithm 13) — modern ✓
- DS digest algorithm modernrecommended
DS digest: SHA-256 — modern ✓
- DNSKEY algorithm secureoptional
DNSKEY: ECDSA P-256 — modern ✓
- RRSIG TTL saferecommended
Record TTLs do not exceed RRSIG validity periods ✓
- Chain of trust completecritical
Complete chain: DNSKEY + DS + RRSIG ✓
IPv6
- Website reachable via IPv6recommended
2 AAAA record(s) ✓
- Mail servers reachable via IPv6recommended
5/5 MX server(s) with IPv6 ✓
- Nameservers reachable via IPv6recommended
2/2 NS server(s) with IPv6 ✓
Email security
- SPF record presentcritical
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:amazonses.com include:mail.zendesk.com include:spf.mail.intercom.io include:mktomail.com include:registrarmail.net -all
- SPF syntax validcritical
SPF syntax is correct ✓
- SPF policy strict (-all)recommended
SPF uses -all (hard fail) ✓
- DKIM foundrecommended
DKIM selector: s1 ✓
- DMARC record presentrecommended
v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:[email protected],mailto:[email protected]; ruf=mailto:[email protected];
- DMARC policy quarantine or betterrecommended
DMARC policy: reject ✓
- DMARC policy rejectoptional
DMARC policy: reject ✓
- BIMI record presentoptional
BIMI logo: https://www.hackerone.com/assets/images/logo_short.svg
- BIMI configuration validoptional
BIMI correctly configured ✓
- MTA-STS record presentoptional
MTA-STS configured ✓
- MTA-STS policy enforcedoptional
MTA-STS mode: enforce ✓
- MX records validcritical
5 MX record(s) ✓
- MX domains use DNSSECrecommended
0/2 MX domain(s) have DNSSEC. Ask your mail provider to enable DNSSEC
- MX DNSSEC validation OKrecommended
DNSSEC not enabled for MX domains
- Mail servers not blacklistedcritical
1 MX server(s) checked against 13 blacklists - clean ✓
- No critical blacklist listingscritical
No blacklist listings ✓
Web security
- CAA records presentrecommended
5 CAA record(s) ✓
- CAA policy strictoptional
CAA limits certificate authorities ✓
- TLSA records (DANE)optional
No TLSA/DANE records. Add TLSA at _25._tcp.mail for DANE email encryption
- DANE configuration validoptional
No DANE configured
- No sensitive info in TXTcritical
No sensitive data leaked ✓
- Verification records reviewedinfo
13 verification records found (Slack, Atlassian, Facebook/Meta, Stripe, Zoom...). Review these - they reveal your tech stack to attackers. Remove unused service verifications
- HTTPS availablecritical
HTTPS working (status 200) ✓
- Valid certificatecritical
Certificate chain is valid and trusted ✓
- HTTP redirects to HTTPScritical
HTTP automatically redirects to HTTPS ✓
- HSTS enabledrecommended
HSTS enabled (max-age=31536000, includeSubDomains, preload) ✓
- HSTS max-age >= 1 yearoptional
max-age=31536000 (≥1 year) ✓
- X-Frame-Options headerrecommended
X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN ✓
- X-Content-Type-Options headerrecommended
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff ✓
- Content-Security-Policy headerrecommended
Content-Security-Policy configured ✓
- Referrer-Policy headerrecommended
No Referrer-Policy header. Add Referrer-Policy: strict-origin-when-cross-origin
- security.txt presentoptional
Contact: https://hackerone.com/security/reports/new
- security.txt validoptional
security.txt has required Contact and Expires fields ✓
- HTTP/3 (QUIC) supportedoptional
HTTP/3 (QUIC v1) on port 443 Detection methods: QUIC probe: QUIC v1 (RFC 9000) (7ms)
- QUIC UDP reachableoptional
QUIC reachable on UDP/443 (7ms) — QUIC v1 (RFC 9000) ✓
- HTTPS DNS record (SVCB)optional
No HTTPS DNS record (type 65). Add HTTPS record for faster HTTP/3 discovery: hackerone.com IN HTTPS 1 . alpn="h3,h2"
Issues found (1)
Excessive verification TXT records
Your domain has many third-party verification records. These reveal your tech stack to potential attackers (reconnaissance). Review and remove unused verifications
Learn moreRecommendations (1)
Review verification TXT records
Your domain has many third-party verification records that reveal your tech stack (Google, Microsoft, Atlassian, etc.). Review each one: 1) Remove records for services no longer used 2) Consider if each service really needs domain verification 3) Use a subdomain for less critical services. This is an information disclosure issue - attackers can map your SaaS footprint.
Impact: Reduces reconnaissance surface and limits attacker knowledge of your infrastructure
About this report
IntoDNS.AI evaluates hackerone.com against DNS hygiene, email authentication, and transport-security best practices, scoring each check and rolling them up into an overall grade. Results reflect public DNS as observed on June 10, 2026 and may differ from a live scan if the domain has since changed its configuration.
Want to check your own domain? Scan any domain on the homepage.
Last analyzed: June 10, 2026 · Google Public DNS